By Jerome Enriquez John –
In the northern reaches of India lies Jammu, part of the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir. While the region is often discussed internationally in terms of geopolitics and conflict, far less attention is paid to its smallest minorities. Among them is a Christian community that constitutes less than one percent of the population and continues to face an entrenched form of discrimination rooted in India’s caste system.
One of the most persistent manifestations of this discrimination is the continued use of the caste-based label “Bhangi Christian.” Historically, the term Bhangi referred to Dalit communities forced into sanitation and sweeping work—occupations considered “polluting” within the caste hierarchy. Although such work is no longer hereditary or exclusive, the label remains socially powerful, demonstrating how caste identity can survive religious conversion, legal reform, and generational change.
Conversion Without Liberation
Many Christians in Jammu trace their ancestry to Dalit communities positioned at the lowest levels of the caste order. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, significant numbers converted to Christianity, seeking spiritual meaning as well as relief from caste-based humiliation and exclusion.
For these communities, conversion was not merely theological; it was an assertion of dignity. Christianity’s emphasis on equality before God stood in direct contrast to a social system that defined worth by birth. However, while religious identity changed, social perception largely did not.
Today, Christians in Jammu—regardless of education, profession, or income—are still routinely identified by the caste label “Bhangi.” The term no longer reflects occupation or social function. Instead, it operates as a mechanism of inherited stigma, fixing individuals to a past they did not choose.
A Minority Within a Minority
Christians form an extremely small demographic group in the region. According to the 2011 Census of India, Christians constituted only 0.28% of the population of Jammu and Kashmir. In Jammu district, Christians accounted for 0.79% of the population (approximately 12,104 individuals out of 1.5 million), while Jammu city recorded a slightly higher proportion of 1.35% (Census of India, 2011a; 2011b; 2011c).
Their numerical marginality contributes to their invisibility in public discourse and policymaking. This invisibility is compounded by legal exclusion. Under India’s Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, affirmative action benefits—such as reservations in education and government employment—are restricted to Dalits who identify as Hindu, Sikh, or Buddhist. Dalits who convert to Christianity or Islam are excluded, despite continuing to face caste-based discrimination (National Commission for Minorities, 2008; Thorat & Joshi, 2015).
This creates a structural paradox: Dalit Christians are told that caste has no place in Christianity, yet they remain socially treated as caste-marked—and are denied legal protections on the assumption that caste no longer applies to them.
When Language Becomes Violence
Caste-based labels are not merely descriptive; they are performative. Language shapes social reality. The continued use of terms such as “Bhangi Christian” reinforces assumptions about worth, capability, and social place. Studies on caste discrimination show that such labelling affects access to housing, employment opportunities, and social mobility, even when individuals possess similar qualifications (Deshpande, 2011; Human Rights Watch, 2007).
The psychological impact is equally significant. Repeated exposure to caste stigma has been shown to contribute to internalized inferiority, reduced self-esteem, and social withdrawal (Thorat & Newman, 2010). Disturbingly, caste distinctions sometimes persist even within Christian communities themselves, through informal segregation and silence—demonstrating how deeply caste ideology is embedded in social life.
A Global Question of Dignity
Although rooted in South Asia, caste-based discrimination is increasingly recognized as a global human rights concern. The United Nations has repeatedly acknowledged caste as a form of descent-based discrimination prohibited under international human rights law (UN Human Rights Council, 2016).
The experience of Christians in Jammu raises broader questions relevant far beyond India:
Can equality exist when inherited stigma remains socially acceptable?
What does justice mean when identity is reduced to ancestry rather than humanity?
Toward Recognition and Justice
Ending caste-based labelling requires more than legal reform. It demands sustained challenges to social habits, language, and institutional silence. Religious communities, civil society, and the state must confront the prejudices they have normalized.
The persistence of caste stigma among Christians in Jammu is a reminder to the global community that systems of inequality do not vanish with conversion, modernization, or constitutional guarantees. They endure until societies actively choose to dismantle them.
Justice begins when people are seen not through inherited labels, but through shared human dignity.
Jerome Enriquez John is an author and human rights activist. His work focuses on caste, minority rights, religious freedom, and social justice in South Asia.
——————-
References
- Census of India. (2011a). Religion-wise population data: Jammu district (2011 Census). Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.
- Census of India. (2011b). Religion-wise population data: Jammu city (2011 Census). Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.
- Census of India. (2011c). Religion-wise population data: Jammu and Kashmir (2011 Census). Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.
- Deshpande, A. (2011). The grammar of caste: Economic discrimination in contemporary India. Oxford University Press.
- Human Rights Watch. (2007). Hidden apartheid: Caste discrimination against India’s “untouchables.” Human Rights Watch.
- National Commission for Minorities. (2008). Report on Dalit Christians and Dalit Muslims. Government of India.
- Thorat, S., & Joshi, O. (2015). Caste and social exclusion: Marginalised groups in Indian society. Oxford University Press.
- Thorat, S., & Newman, K. (2010). Blocked by caste: Economic discrimination in modern India. Oxford University Press.
- United Nations Human Rights Council. (2016). Report of the Special Rapporteur on minority issues: Discrimination based on caste and analogous systems of inherited status.